ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To explore the long-term persistence of COVID-19-related impairment and the ability to work after the acute phase of the illness. METHOD: The 19,101 COVID-19 workers' compensation claims filed between January 1, 2020, and December 31, 2021, with follow-up to May 31, 2022, were analyzed. RESULTS: The average time lost from work decreased from 77 days in the first quarter of 2020 to 9.2 days in the fourth quarter of 2021, and the proportion of claims with 30 days or more of lost time decreased from 40.4% to 2.8 days in the same time frame. CONCLUSION: COVID-19 indemnity claims filed in later quarters of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic have much lower average time lost from work and lower proportions of workers' compensation claims with more than 30, 60, and 150 days of lost time compared with earlier quarters.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Workers' Compensation , Humans , SARS-CoV-2 , Insurance Carriers , Pandemics , COVID-19/epidemiologyABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To examine the attributes associated with long duration COVID- 19 workers' compensation (WC) claims. METHODS: A study was conducted on 13,153 COVID-19 WC claims accepted by a workers' compensation insurance carrier between January 1, 2020 and November 30, 2021. RESULTS: 1) Ninety-five percent of accepted WC claims were closed within the study period; 2) five percent of claims had 30âdays or longer of lost time accounting for 65% of total paid WC costs; 3) medical costs increased 8-fold once paid days lost crossed the threshold of 60âdays or greater; 4) age was the strongest risk factor associated with increased WC costs and prolonged impairment. CONCLUSION: Age at the time of infection was the major factor associated with prolonged impairment and high costs of COVID-19 related WC claims.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Workers' Compensation , COVID-19/epidemiology , Humans , Insurance Carriers , Risk FactorsABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Determine the industries with the highest proportion of accepted COVID-19 related workers' compensation (WC) claims. METHODS: Study included 21,336 WC claims (1898 COVID-19 and 19,438 other claims) that were filed between January 1, 2020 and August 31, 2020 from 11 states in the Midwest United States. RESULT: The overwhelming proportion of all COVID-19 related WC claims submitted and accepted were from healthcare workers (83.77%). Healthcare was the only industrial classification that was at significantly higher COVID-19 WC claim submission risk (odds ratio [OR]: 4.00; 95% confidence intervals [CI]: 2.77 to 5.79) controlling for type of employment, sex, age, and presumption of COVID-19 work-relatedness. Within healthcare employment, WC claims submitted by workers in medical laboratories had the highest risk (crude rate ratio of 8.78). CONCLUSION: Healthcare employment is associated with an increased risk of developing COVID-19 infections and submitting a workers' compensation claim.
Subject(s)
COVID-19/economics , Health Personnel/classification , Industry/classification , Occupational Diseases/economics , Workers' Compensation/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Aged , Female , Health Personnel/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Industry/statistics & numerical data , Male , Medical Laboratory Personnel/statistics & numerical data , Middle Aged , Midwestern United States/epidemiology , Odds Ratio , SARS-CoV-2ABSTRACT
The COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in a significant increase in accommodation requests from employees seeking temporary alterations to or relief from their job demands. To maintain consistency and ensure a standard approach, Johns Hopkins Medicine established a COVID-19 Accommodation Review committee that includes experts from the occupational health, legal, and human resources departments, as well as an Americans with Disabilities Act coordinator. In this article, the authors describe the workflow and various components of their institution's accommodations review process, which has resulted in a more consistent and equitable approach to granting requests.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate an empirical olfactory test to identify COVID-19 cases during a workplace entrance screening. METHOD: An active screening for olfactory dysfunction using water and vinegar was conducted in April to June 2020 among 4120 meat packing workers in Latin America. RESULTS: The sensitivity and specificity of the active olfactory screening examination were 41.2% and 85.3%, respectively, using reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) tests as a gold standard. 10.6% of employees who tested positive for COVID-19 had an olfactory dysfunction as their only symptom. These individuals would not have been identified with standard workplace screening measures including temperature screening. CONCLUSION: Active screening for olfactory dysfunction may serve as a valuable tool to both identify potential COVID-19 infections and exclude those who do not have infection and should be a part of parallel algorithm combined with standard workplace entrance screening procedures.